When Combining DIC with Thermography Use the Right Spray Paint

Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technology is to strain gauges as thermography is to thermocouple measurements.  Like thermography, DIC is desirable because it is a non-contact measurement technique that yields full-field measurement results.  InnoSolve has developed a method for mapping full-field thermography measurements to 3D DIC measurements to offer customers the ability to correct for thermal effects.  This is advantageous for complex test setups that involve thermal gradients and mechanical loads. One example where thermography and DIC synergize is structural qualification testing of launch vehicle cryogenic tanks.  DIC requires the application of random visible light black and white speckle patterns that are often applied by spray paint. The purpose of this post is to compare and measure spray paint emissivities of DIC paint with a FLIR One Pro infrared camera and show the importance of choosing the right spray paint.

The reflective temperature was measured to be 74.9F for the test setup and was acquired indoors at 1:15pm on 7/7/19.   The test featured four metal coupon samples which were cut by hand with tin snips. The samples were approximately 1” wide by 5” tall.  Electrical tape was applied to the left half of the top specimen while the remainder was left bare. The next sample from the top was painted with a flat white spray paint.  The next sample down was painted flat black spray paint from a different brand. The final sample was first painted with the flat white spray paint and then speckled using the flat black spray paint to generate the DIC speckle pattern.  All samples were placed on a vinyl t-shirt press. The press was set to a temperature of 220F.

The heated temperature of the samples was less than the vinyl t-shirt heat press set point temperature due to natural heat convection of the highly conductive metal samples.  The metal samples were not flat due to the hand cutting process and resulted in the thermal gradients observed on the samples. Also the infrared camera is only accurate to within 5% or about 10F.  Finally, the heat press is well worn and may not be calibrated to the correct temperature.

The emissivity of the bare metal, white, black, and speckle spray paint was calculated to be 0.12, 0.88, 0.64, and 0.65 respectively.  The corrective action will be to use the white brand spray paint because it has significantly greater emissivity which will provide more accurate temperature measurements. Thus, when combining DIC with thermography it is important to choose the right spray paint. InnoSolve uses ITC certified thermography techniques and can help you with your thermography or DIC test needs.

Oscillator Quantitative Imaging Harbor Freight vs Rigid

Oscillator tools have become the go to tool for just about everything around the house. From cutting drywall to cutting baseboard, oscillator tools are perfect for the job due to their ability to rapidly oscillate between tiny cutting strokes.Many have undertaken the task of comparing the many oscillator tools on the market through product testing. This post will not attempt to reproduce that work. Instead, this post will leverage InnoSolve’s competence in quantifying video.

Frequency and Cutting Stroke

We will be comparing the frequency of oscillation and cutting stroke angle of two popular oscillator tools with the help of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technology.Oscillator tools oscillate at about 20,000 cycles per second. This equates to about 333 Hz. If you wish to see an oscillator tool frozen in time you can sample a functioning oscillator tool at 333 frames per second (fps). However, a frozen oscillator tool is not very interesting so you probably want to sample at a rate that is at least 10X faster than 333 fps or 3,330 fps. 3,300 fps did not seem sporty enough for this post so we recorded at 16,200 fps. The photogrammetry targets were attached to the head of each tool without a blade in the analysis video. Photogrammetry targets were included on each tool’s body so that rigid body motion due to each hand could be taken into account.

Chicago Electric vs Rigid

The two oscillator tools show cased in this post are made by Chicago Electric and RIDGID tools. The Chicago Electric tool can be found at Harbor Freight Tools and costs about $20. This tool does not advertises an angle of oscillation. The RIDGID oscillating tool was purchased from Home Depot for about $80. This tool advertises 4 degrees of cutting stroke at 20,000 revolutions per minute (rpm).From just looking at the high speed video, it is difficult to accurately quantify how fast and at what angle of oscillation these tools function. Recording the two tools in operation side-by-side is a little better for comparison purposes but still lacks quantization. However, when DIC is applied to track the photogrammetry targets, the angle of oscillation and frequency of oscillation can be easily quantified.

DIC Analysis

From the DIC analysis, the Chicago Electric tool oscillates 3 degrees and the RIDGID tool oscillates a little more than the advertised 4 degrees. From looking at the time scale at 0.016 and 0.026 seconds, 4 oscillations of the Chicago Electric occur over the 0.01 second interval. This equates to 400 Hz or 24,000 rpm. In comparison the RIDGID tool completes 5 cycles from 0.01 to.026 seconds. This equates to 313 Hz or 18,750 rpm.In summary the Chicago Electric tool has a smaller cutting stroke than the RIDGID tool but the Chicago Electric tool operates at a faster rpm.